Supporting Change
The next two levels of this 7-level hierarchy enable the continuance of the entity, either directly supporting actual changes or generating changes that are needed for continuity.
Sustenance: Level-4 Change
formal name for the . It appears to be:
is proposed as thePH3: CHANGE |
---|
Primary Hierarchy |
L7: ? |
L6: ? |
L5: ? |
- the only basis for a continued existence;
- what is often taken for granted in the heat of a change.
There does not appear to be a suitable alternate name.
Function. entails providing whatever is required for a state to continue to exist.
Essence: foundation for both continuity and change.
is thePressure: If the analysis in the Architecture Room is correct, well-being pressure emerging from .
is primarily influenced by theResult: The continuous existence of a given state trajectory.
Use:
is activated whenever there is an actual or threatened loss of a resource required by the entity.Preoccupation: How to handle emerging demands on an existing state.
Hope: For resource availability in abundance.
Fear: Depletion of resources or uncontrolled increase in stressors.
Failure: If
cannot be ensured when necessary, the entity is in a state of deprivation. Relevant change cannot be sustained and the entity's condition will deteriorate.Responses: Positive is appreciation for the provision of resources. Negative is doubt that this provision is worthwhile.
Of course is not enough given the entity exists in a dynamic impersonal environment that cannot be controlled...
Adaptation: Level-5 Change
formal name for the . It appears to be:
is proposed as thePH3: CHANGE |
---|
Primary Hierarchy |
L7: ? |
L6: ? |
- the consequence of existing in an environment that cannot be controlled;
- a dynamic process of fitting the environment that enables natural selection.
There does not appear to be a suitable alternate name.
Function. entails fitting in with uncontrollable events within or without to enable the entity to exist in its environment.
Essence: control of unmanageable and potentially destructive forces through self-adjustment. The entity's alternative and preferred control method is regulation—in which case the environment must adapt so that the entity can remain unchanged.
is about thePressure: If the analysis in the Architecture Room is correct, understanding pressure emerging from .
is primarily influenced by theResult: A new sustainable equilibrium within and coexistence without.
Use:
is activated by the impingement of potentially destructive forces.Preoccupation: Omnipresence of pressures and stressors internally and externally that might threaten integrity and continuance.
Hope: For sufficient resilience and adaptability.
Fear: Becoming overwhelmed and disintegrating.
Failure: If
does not occur when necessary, the entity will be damaged or even destroyed.Responses: Positive is relief that the threat is averted. Negative is dissatisfaction with the outcome.
Of course is not enough if there is a desire for a strategic response ...but this moves from actual change and enters the realm of potential change.
Anything more sophisticated that adaptation demands modelling of the entity's present and future states.
- Continue to levels that guide change.
Originally posted: 30-May-2024.